Article Text

Download PDFPDF
In patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), enoxaparin was as effective as warfarin for VTE prophylaxis and reduced fatal haemorrhage

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 QUESTION: In patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a fixed dose of subcutaneous low molecular weight (LMW) heparin better than oral warfarin for secondary prophylaxis of VTE?

Design

Randomised {allocation concealed*}, blinded {outcome assessors and data analysts},* controlled trial with primary follow up to 3 months.

Setting

25 centres in France.

Patients

146 patients >18 years of age (mean age 66 y, 55% women) with cancer of any type and deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Exclusion criteria were previous heparin induced thrombocytopenia, allergy to iodine, pregnancy, fibrinolytic treatment within 3 days, oral anticoagulant use for >5 days, treatment with full dose heparin for this episode of VTE, major pulmonary embolism with shock, life expectancy <3 months, contraindication to anticoagulants, severe hepatic failure, planned major surgery or …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Sources of funding: Aventis and the Délégation à la Recherche Clinique.

  • For correspondence: Dr G Meyer, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. guy.meyer{at}hop.egp.ap-hop-paris.fr.

  • * See glossary.

  • Information provided by author.