Article Text

PDF

Lifestyle recommendations reduced blood pressure in patients with above optimal blood pressure
  1. Allan V Prochazka, MD
  1. Denver Veteran’s Administration Medical Center
 Denver, Colorado, USA

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 QUESTION: In patients with above optimal blood pressure (BP), what is the relative effectiveness of 2 behavioural interventions (established lifestyle recommendations [ELR] and ELR plus the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet) compared with advice only?

    Design

    Randomised (allocation concealed*), blinded (data collectors),* controlled trial with 6 months of follow up (PREMIER Clinical Trial).

    Setting

    4 clinical centres in Baltimore, Maryland; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Durham, North Carolina; and Portland, Oregon, USA.

    Patients

    810 generally healthy adults who were ≥25 years of age (mean age 50 y, 62% women), had above optimal BP (mean systolic BP 120–159 mm Hg and diastolic BP 80–95 mm Hg during 3 screening visits), were not taking antihypertensive medication, and had a body mass index of 18.5–45.0. Exclusion criteria were regular use of drugs affecting BP; target organ damage or diabetes; use of weight loss medication; previous cardiovascular event; congestive heart failure; angina; cancer diagnosis or treatment in the previous 2 years; consumption of >21 alcoholic drinks/week; and pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or lactation. 87% of patients completed all 3 follow up visits at 6 months.

    Intervention

    268 patients were allocated to the ELR group (weight loss for overweight participants, reduced sodium intake, increased physical activity, and limited alcohol intake). 269 patients were allocated to the ELR plus DASH diet group (reduced fat and cholesterol; increased potassium, calcium, magnesium, protein, and fibre). Patients in both of these groups had 14 group meetings and 4 individual counselling sessions during the initial 6 months. 273 patients were allocated to the advice group (a single 30 min individual session, delivered by a dietitian).

    Main outcome measures

    Change in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included change in diastolic BP.

    Main results

    Analysis was by intention to treat. Patients in the ELR and ELR plus DASH groups had greater reductions in systolic and diastolic BP than patients in the advice group (table); the 2 behavioural intervention groups did not differ (table).

    Established lifestyle recommendations (ELR) or ELR plus Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet v advice only for above optimal blood pressure (BP)†

    Conclusion

    Patients with above optimal blood pressure (BP) who received established lifestyle recommendations, with or without the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet, had greater reductions in BP than those who received advice only.

    Commentary

    The PREMIER study shows that lifestyle interventions can have clinically important effects on BP and progression to overt hypertension. Previous work focused on weight loss and dietary sodium reduction.1 The DASH diet expanded these concepts to increase potassium consumption with fruits and vegetables and increase calcium intake with low fat dairy products.2 A key issue has been whether addition of the DASH diet to standard recommendations would result in improved BP. The behavioural lifestyle intervention was intensive, and this translated into weight reduction (on average 5 kg) and reduction in urinary sodium excretion. The resultant drops in BP were relatively small in absolute magnitude, but intervention patients were more likely to have optimal BP at 6 months. The non-significant differences between the ELR and the ELR plus DASH groups suggest that clinicians should focus on promoting weight loss through exercise and caloric restriction including dietary sodium reduction.

    We now have strong evidence in hypertension and in diabetes prevention3 that lifestyle interventions are possible and can lead to clear cut benefits for patients. The challenge will be to effectively implement these findings in clinical practice with a full spectrum of patients. Clinicians can recommend these lifestyle changes but should be realistic and expect that only a select group of self motivated patients may adopt them. Public health officials should take heed of the results of this trial and devise creative and cost effective ways to implement them broadly.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding: National Institutes of Health.

    • For correspondence: Dr L J Appel, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. lappel{at}jhmi.edu

    • A modified version of this abstract appears in Evidence-Based Nursing.

    • * See glossary.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.