Article Text

PDF

Oestrogen plus progestin reduced risk of fracture in postmenopausal women
  1. Alexandra Papaioannou, MD
  1. McMaster University
 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 Q In postmenopausal women, does oestrogen plus progestin reduce the risk of fracture?

    Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★☆☆ IM/Ambulatory care ★★★★★★☆ Endocrine ★★★★★☆☆ Rheumatology ★★★★★★☆

    METHODS

    Embedded ImageDesign:

    randomised placebo controlled trial.

    Embedded ImageAllocation:

    {allocation concealed*}.

    Embedded ImageBlinding:

    blinded {clinicians, participants, data collectors, outcome assessors, and monitoring committee}.*

    Embedded ImageFollow up period:

    mean 5.6 years.

    Embedded ImageSetting:

    {40 US clinical centres.}

    Embedded ImageParticipants:

    16 608 women who were 50–79 years of age (mean age 63 y) and had an intact uterus. {Exclusion criteria included probable survival of <3 years, cancer in the past 10 years, and low haematocrit or platelet counts.}

    Embedded ImageIntervention:

    a single table of either conjugated equine oestrogen, 0.625 mg/day and medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/day (n = 8506), or placebo (n = 8102).

    Embedded ImageOutcomes:

    fracture (except fracture of the ribs, chest or sternum, skull or face, fingers, toes, and cervical vertebrae). A global index assessed the benefits and risks of treatment by incorporating other disease outcomes (coronary heart disease; invasive breast, endometrial, or colorectal cancer; stroke; pulmonary embolism; hip fracture; and death from other causes).

    Embedded ImageFollow up:

    94%.

    MAIN RESULTS

    Analysis was by intention to treat. Fewer women in the hormone therapy group than in the placebo group had a fracture (table). The effect for total fracture risk remained constant across different subgroups. When treatment effects on other important outcomes were included in a global model, hormone therapy had no net benefit, even in women with high risk of fracture.

    Oestrogen plus progestin (O + P) v placebo in postmenopausal women at mean 5.6 years*

    CONCLUSIONS

    In postmenopausal women, oestrogen plus progestin reduced the risk of fracture. In a global model assessing treatment effects on all outcomes, hormone therapy had no net benefit.

    Abstract and commentary also appear in ACP Journal Club.

    Commentary

    The study by Cauley et al provides final analysis of fracture endpoints previously reported in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial.1 The authors, using a global index, confirmed there was no net benefit of oestrogen and progestin therapy even in women at high risk of fracture. However, the global index did not include such factors as the risk of dementia and the increase of gynaecological diagnostic procedures because of vaginal bleeding. The risk of probable dementia increased 2 fold in older women allocated to the oestrogen and progestin therapy and probably resulted from the increase in vascular dementia in the WHI Memory Study.2 In addition, the number of women requiring diagnostic biopsies increased more than 5 fold among those allocated to combined hormones.3

    Of interest is the finding that oestrogen plus progestin reduced the risk of hip fractures only in women who reported a baseline calcium intake of >1200 mg/day. However, vitamin D intake was not reported.

    These studies will assist women and their practitioners in making informed choices. Hormone therapy is no longer generally recommended preventive therapy, but in postmenopausal women with substantial vasomotor symptoms, hormone replacement may be a short term option primarily to treat symptoms and secondarily to decrease the risk of fractures. However, other therapies, such as bisphosphonates and selective receptor modulators, should be considered first line therapy for preventing and treating osteoporosis.4

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • * See glossary.

    • For correspondence: Dr J A Cauley, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jcauleypitt.edu

    • Sources of funding: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and Wyeth-Ayerst Research.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles

    • Glossary
      BMJ Publishing Group Ltd