Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Cross-over randomised controlled trial
Long-acting β-agonist step-up therapy is more likely to provide best response, compared to inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene-receptor antagonist step-up in children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids
  1. Mike Thomas
  1. Centre of Academic Primary CareSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen,Foresterhill Health Centre, Aberdeen, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mike Thomas
    Cotswold Cottage, Oakridge, Stroud, Gloucs GL67NZ, UK; mikethomas{at}doctors.org.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Commentary on:

Context

Asthma is the commonest chronic illness of childhood.1 As prevention is impossible, management is aimed at controlling symptoms and reducing future risk. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are highly effective in controlling asthma, some children will continue to have symptoms or exacerbations2 and may require more treatment. The principal ‘step-up’ options include adding either an inhaled long-acting β-agonist (LABA) or an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) to ICS or using high-dose ICS. The evidence base informing this decision is weak in children, and controversy persists.3 Guidelines suggest that for children aged 5 years or older, LABA addition is the best ‘first-choice’ option,1 although recent safely concerns have lead the FDA to make different recommendations.4 This timely study aimed to compare the efficiency of these three step-up options in children who remained symptomatic despite ICS (fluticasone 100 μg twice daily). It also aimed to identify phenotypic or genotypic factors predicting a differential response to treatment. …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.