You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 18, Issue 1
  • Closure of a patent foramen ovale with a device does not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events

Article info

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Therapeutics
Randomised controlled trial
Closure of a patent foramen ovale with a device does not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events

Authors

  1. Correspondence to: Professor Heinrich Mattle
    Department of Neurology, Freiburgstrasse, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; heinrich.mattle{at}insel.ch
View Full Text

Citation

Mattle HP, Mono M
Closure of a patent foramen ovale with a device does not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2013;18:34-35.

Publication history

  • First published July 10, 2012.
Online issue publication 
June 24, 2019

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions