Statistics from Altmetric.com
Commentary on: Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. ROMICAT-II Investigators. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2012;367:299–308.
Chest pain is the second leading reason for presenting to the emergency department (ED); however, the majority of these patients do not have an acute cardiac diagnosis at the time of discharge.1 ,2 Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has been shown to have a very high negative predictive value (NPV) and an excellent intermediate-term prognosis.3 In this new study, Hoffmann and colleagues investigated the effectiveness of CCTA versus the standard therapy for the evaluation of patients presenting with chest pain to ED as well as downstream testing, radiation exposure and overall cost of care.
This study was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, strategy-controlled trial …
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.