You are here

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Perspective
Peer review of human studies run amok: a break in the fiduciary relation between scientists and the public

Authors

  • Sarah W Feldstein Ewing Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Richard Saitz Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine, Boston University Schools of Public Health and Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to : Sarah W Feldstein Ewing
    , Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC09 5030, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; swfeld{at}salud.unm.edu

Citation

Ewing SWF, Saitz R
Peer review of human studies run amok: a break in the fiduciary relation between scientists and the public
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2015;20:1-2.

Publication history

  • First published August 13, 2014.
Online issue publication 
October 25, 2017

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/