Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Randomised controlled trial
No differences between operative and non-operative treatments of proximal humerus fractures
  1. Antti P Launonen,
  2. Ville M Mattila
  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Antti P Launonen, Department of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, Tampere 33501, Finland; antti.launonen{at}pshp.fi

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Context

The operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates has substantially increased.1 Just recently, our study group published a meta-analysis showing no difference between non-operative treatment and surgery.2 After this meta-analysis, a novel pragmatic multicentre PROFHER study was published.

Methods

In the PROFHER trial, 32 UK hospitals screened patients over 16 years old (n=1250), who had a displaced proximal humerus fracture, for study eligibility between 2008 and 2011. …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.