Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Randomised controlled trial
Large ovarian cancer screening trial shows modest mortality reduction, but does not justify population-based ovarian cancer screening
  1. Nicolas Wentzensen
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Nicolas Wentzensen, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7-E114; Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; wentzenn{at}mail.nih.gov

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Commentary on: OpenUrlPubMed

Context

Ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynaecological malignancy. Most cancers are detected at advanced stages when therapeutic options are limited. Epithelial ovarian cancers are heterogeneous with respect to cell of origin, molecular pathways, morphological appearance, risk factor associations and survival.1 ,2 High-grade serous carcinomas are most common and have the worst prognosis. Currently, proposed ovarian cancer screening strategies include transvaginal ultrasound and CA-125 blood testing. In a previous randomised controlled trial evaluating these strategies, no mortality benefit was observed.3

Methods

In the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), around 200 000 women aged 50–74 were enrolled and randomly assigned to …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles