Skip to main content
Log in

Meta-analysis of dropout rates in randomized controlled clinical trials

Opioid analgesia for osteoarthritis pain

Metaanalyse zur Abbruchrate in randomisierten kontrollierten klinischen Studien

Opioidanalgesie bei Arthroseschmerz

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Schmerz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The interpretation of opioid studies in patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis is limited by a high dropout rate. Therefore, the implication of dropouts on the recommendation of opioids in chronic osteoarthritis pain was analyzed.

Data sources

The databases of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Internet from 1990–2009 were searched.

Study selection

Two independent authors included randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the effects of chronic opioid treatment for the management of osteoarthritis pain. In order to calculate the odds ratio, only placebo-controlled trials were included.

Data extraction

The primary outcome parameter was the dropout rate. Secondarily, the effect size was calculated. Data extraction was conducted by two independent authors.

Results

A total of 19 studies reporting results of 3,871 treatment and 2,080 placebo outcomes were retrieved. Compared to placebo, opioid treatment was associated with a significantly increased total dropout rate (OR=1.3, 95%CI 1.2–1.4). Discontinuation of treatment was related to adverse events (OR=4.0, 95%CI 3.4–4.6). Lack of analgesia was associated with a significantly reduced dropout rate in opioid groups (OR=0.4, 95%CI 0.3–0.5). Analgesic effects were significantly better in opioid-treated patients (p=0.01).

Conclusion

In spite of analgesic effects, many osteoarthritis patients prefer to stop chronic opioid use, because of adverse events. Therefore, opioids are not generally recommended in osteoarthritis.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Interpretation von Opioidstudien bei Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen bei Arthrose wird durch eine hohe Abbruchrate eingeschränkt. Wir haben untersucht, welche Bedeutung eine differenzierte Analyse der Gründe für Therapieabbrüche für die Empfehlungen zur Opioidtherapie bei Arthroseschmerz hat.

Fragestellung

Ziel der Untersuchung war zu analysieren, wie hoch die Abbruchrate im Rahmen einer Opioidtherapie bei chronischen Schmerzen infolge Arthrose ist.

Datenquellen

Wir führten Recherchen in Medline, Embase, der Cochrane Library sowie im Internet für den Zeitraum 1990–2009 durch.

Studienauswahl

Zwei Autoren wählten unabhängig voneinander randomisierte kontrollierte Studien aus, die die Wirkung von Opioidanalgetika bei chronischen Arthroseschmerzen untersuchten. Wir beschränkten uns auf placebokontrollierte Studien, um ein Odds Ratio berechnen zu können.

Datenextraktion

Der primäre Endpunkt war die Abbruchrate. Sekundär wurde auch die Effektgröße bestimmt. Die Datenextraktion wurde durch zwei Autoren unabhängig voneinander durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Wir analysierten 19 Studien, die insgesamt 3871 mit Opioiden behandelte Patienten und 2080 Placebopatienten einschlossen. Verglichen mit Placebo führt die Opioidbehandlung zu einer signifikant höheren Abbruchrate (Odds Ratio [OR] 1,3; 95%-Konfidenzintervall [KI] 1,2–1,4). Diese Therapieabbrüche waren assoziiert mit Nebenwirkungen (OR 4,0; 95%-KI 3,4–4,6). Eine fehlende Schmerzlinderung führte zu einer signifikant niedrigeren Abbruchrate in der Opioidgruppe (OR 0,4; 95%-KI 0,3–0,5). Die durchschnittliche analgetische Wirkung bei mit Opioiden behandelten Patienten war signifikant besser als in der Placebogruppe (p=0,01).

Schlussfolgerung

Trotz der analgetischen Wirkung beenden vielen Patienten eine Schmerztherapie mit Opioiden wegen Nebenwirkungen. Aufgrund der hohen Abbruchrate besteht trotz nachgewiesener Wirkung keine generelle Indikation für eine Opioidtherapie bei Arthrose. Die Ergebnisse sprechen dafür, die Indikation im Einzelfall einer Opioidbehandlung zu stellen und die subjektive Bewertung von Analgesie und Nebenwirkungen auch im Verlauf einer Opioidtherapie zu überprüfen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avouac J, Gossec L, Dougados M (2007) Efficacy and safety of opioids for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15:957–965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Babul N, Noveck R, Chipman H et al (2004) Efficacy and safety of extended-release, once-daily tramadol in chronic pain: a randomized 12-week clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Pain Symptom Manage 28:59–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Biegert C, Wagner I, Ludtke R et al (2004) Efficacy and safety of willow bark extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: results of 2 randomized double-blind controlled trials. J Rheumatol 31:2121–2130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bocanegra TS, Weaver AL, Tindall EA et al (1998) Diclofenac/misoprostol compared with diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Arthrotec Osteoarthritis Study Group. J Rheumatol 25:1602–1611

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burch F, Fishman R, Messina N et al (2007) A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of Tramadol Contramid OAD versus placebo in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis. J Pain Symptom Manage 34:328–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caldwell JR, Hale ME, Boyd RE et al (1999) Treatment of osteoarthritis pain with controlled release oxycodone or fixed combination oxycodone plus acetaminophen added to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a double blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo controlled trial. J Rheumatol 26:862–869

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caldwell JR, Rapoport RJ, Davis JC et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of a once-daily morphine formulation in chronic, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial and an open-label extension trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 23:278–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chindalore VL, Craven RA, Yu KP et al (2005) Adding ultralow-dose naltrexone to oxycodone enhances and prolongs analgesia: a randomized, controlled trial of Oxytrex. J Pain 6:392–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Emkey R, Rosenthal N, Wu SC et al (2004) Efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen tablets (Ultracet) as add-on therapy for osteoarthritis pain in subjects receiving a COX-2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Rheumatol 31:150–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fishman RL, Kistler CJ, Ellerbusch MT et al (2007) Efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of osteoarthritic pain therapy with once-daily tramadol (Tramadol Contramid OAD). J Opioid Manag 3:273–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleischmann RM, Caldwell JR, Roth SM et al (2001) Tramadol for the treatment of joint pain associated with osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Curr Ther Res 62:113–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gana TJ, Pascual ML, Fleming RR et al (2006) Extended-release tramadol in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Curr Med Res Opin 22:1391–1401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gimbel JS, Richards P, Portenoy RK (2003) Controlled-release oxycodone for pain in diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 60:927–934

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harati Y, Gooch C, Swenson M et al (1998) Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 50:1842–1846

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartrick C, Van Hove I, Stegmann JU et al (2009) Efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol immediate release and oxycodone HCl immediate release in patients awaiting primary joint replacement surgery for end-stage joint disease: a 10-day, phase III, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther 31:260–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jadad AR, Mcquay HJ (1996) Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. J Clin Epidemiol 49:235–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kivitz A, Ma C, Ahdieh H et al (2006) A 2-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase III trial comparing the efficacy of oxymorphone extended release and placebo in adults with pain associated with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Clin Ther 28:352–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kosinski M, Janagap C, Gajria K et al (2007) Pain relief and pain-related sleep disturbance with extended-release tramadol in patients with osteoarthritis. Curr Med Res Opin 23:1615–1626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Langford R, Mckenna F, Ratcliffe S et al (2006) Transdermal fentanyl for improvement of pain and functioning in osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:1829–1837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lonts (2009) S3-Guideline LONTS. http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/AWMF/II/041–003m.htm

  22. Malonne H, Coffiner M, Sonet B et al (2004) Efficacy and tolerability of sustained-release tramadol in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther 26:1774–1782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Markenson JA, Croft J, Zhang PG et al (2005) Treatment of persistent pain associated with osteoarthritis with controlled-release oxycodone tablets in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain 21:524–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsumoto AK, Babul N, Ahdieh H (2005) Oxymorphone extended-release tablets relieve moderate to severe pain and improve physical function in osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III trial. Pain Med 6:357–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore A, Mcquay H (2005) Prevalence of opioid adverse events in chronic non-malignant pain: systematic review of randomised trials of oral opioids. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nuesch E, Rutjes AW, Husni E et al (2010) Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev

  27. Peloso PM, Bellamy N, Bensen W et al (2000) Double blind randomized placebo control trial of controlled release codeine in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 27:764–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reinecke H, Sorgatz H (2009) S3 guideline LONTS. Long-term administration of opioids for non-tumor pain. Schmerz 23:440–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roth SH, Fleischmann RM, Burch FX et al (2000) Around-the-clock, controlled-release oxycodone therapy for osteoarthritis-related pain: placebo-controlled trial and long-term evaluation. Arch Intern Med 160:853–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidt H, Lowenstein O, Hesselbarth S et al (2010) S3 guidelines LONTS (Long-term administration of opioids for non-tumor pain). Schmerz 24:71–72; author reply 72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schnitzer TJ, Kamin M, Olson WH (1999) Tramadol allows reduction of naproxen dose among patients with naproxen-responsive osteoarthritis pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 42:1370–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Silverfield JC, Kamin M, Wu SC et al (2002) Tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets for the treatment of osteoarthritis flare pain: a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, add-on study. Clin Ther 24:282–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sindrup SH, Andersen G, Madsen C et al (1999) Tramadol relieves pain and allodynia in polyneuropathy: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Pain 83:85–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thorne C, Beaulieu AD, Callaghan DJ et al (2008) A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of the efficacy and safety of oral controlled-release tramadol and placebo in patients with painful osteoarthritis. Pain Res Manag 13:93–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tolle TR, Treede RD, Zenz M (2009) To give or not to give, that is not the question here! Long-term administration of opioids for non-tumor pain (LONTS). Schmerz 23:437–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vorsanger G, Xiang J, Jordan D et al (2007) Post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and tolerability study of tramadol extended release for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain in geriatric patients. Clin Ther 29(Suppl):2520–2535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Watson CP, Babul N (1998) Efficacy of oxycodone in neuropathic pain: a randomized trial in postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology 50:1837–1841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Watson CP, Moulin D, Watt-Watson J et al (2003) Controlled-release oxycodone relieves neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial in painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain 105:71–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yocum D, Fleischmann R, Dalgin P et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of Meloxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Arch Intern Med 160:2947–2954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zautra AJ, Smith BW (2005) Impact of controlled-release oxycodone on efficacy beliefs and coping efforts among osteoarthritis patients with moderate to severe pain. Clin J Pain 21:471–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

MG received honoraria for lectures by MSD Sharp & Dohme, mundipharma GmbH, Sanofi Aventis, Medtronic, Germany. BH received honoraria for lectures from MSD Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer, Germany. MT received honoraria for lectures from MSD Sharp & Dohme, mundipharma GmbH, Pfizer, Germany.

This analysis was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Gehling.

Additional information

Contribution to the manuscript MG contributed to conception and design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, revision, and statistical analysis. BH contributed to conception and design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, revision, and statistical analysis. MT contributed to conception and design, drafting of the manuscript, revision, and statistical analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gehling, M., Hermann, B. & Tryba, M. Meta-analysis of dropout rates in randomized controlled clinical trials. Schmerz 25, 296–305 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-011-1057-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-011-1057-9

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation