Original contribution
Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis: Common features discovered in cases after litigation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(94)90047-7Get rights and content

Abstract

To identify differences between correctly diagnosed appendicitis and misdiagnosed cases that resulted in litigation between 1982 and 1989 retrospective review of malpractice claims was conducted. A total of emergency department (ED) charts at the time of the initial ED visit were reviewed and compared with 66 concurrent controls. Missed cases appeared less acutely ill, had fewer complaints of right lower quadrant pain, received fewer rectal examinations, received intramuscular (IM) narcotic pain medication for undiagnosed abdominal pain or symptoms, and more often received an ED discharge diagnosis of gastroenteritis. Misdiagnosed patients had a 91% incidence of ruptured appendix, more extensive surgical procedures, and more postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using the Pearson's χ2 Test, Mann-Whitney U test, and stepwise discriminant analysis. Significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis is more likely to occur with patients who present atypically, are not thoroughly examined (as indexed by documentation of a rectal examination), are given IM narcotic pain medication and then discharged from the ED, are diagnosed as having gastroenteritis (despite the absence of the typical diagnostic criteria), and with patients who do not receive appropriate discharge or follow-up instructions.

References (33)

  • TM McGee

    Acute appendicitis in pregnancy

    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1989)
  • FR Lewis et al.

    Appendicitis: A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases

    Arch Surg

    (1975)
  • JT Rogers

    Abdominal pain

    (December, 1986)
  • RL Kravitz et al.

    Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • GC Hamilton

    Acute chest pain

  • Cited by (81)

    • Malpractice in Emergency Medicine—A Review of Risk and Mitigation Practices for the Emergency Medicine Provider

      2018, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conversely, in evaluation of system breakdown in closed claims, certain key behaviors continue to be associated with malpractice claims. Aside from attempting to bring about tort reform legislation, providers should mitigate risk by being aware of these behaviors: clear patient communication, intelligent documentation, utilization of clinical practice guidelines, generalizable diagnoses, reassessment, understandable discharge instructions, and careful management of departures against medical advice (14–16,22,26–28,40–50). Patient communication is found to be more closely associated with legal risk than the nature or magnitude of adverse outcome (14).

    • Missed Acute Appendicitis on Multidetector Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Legal Ramifications, Challenges, and Avoidance Strategies

      2017, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In two-thirds of pediatric cases, including those related to appendicitis, the malpractice suit was not brought against any doctor singly (radiologists included), but was brought in a multiphysician suit.6 In 18% of these multiphysician cases, no particular physician was found to be culpable for a specific medical error, a side-effect of including multiple physicians in the medical record, regardless of their individual responsibility.6 The difficulty in proving culpability in these kinds of cases is evident from other studies of the trial record: most pediatric malpractice suits are settled out of court.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine National Meeting, Washington, DC, May, 1991.

    View full text