BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine publishes original evidence based research, insights and opinions on what matters for health care

Intro Widget

BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine publishes original evidence based research, insights and opinions on what matters for health care. The journal focuses on the tools, methods, and concepts that are basic and central to practising evidence-based medicine.

We deliver relevant, trustworthy and impactful evidence by: disseminating relevant research, providing debate, analysis, and opinion on trusted evidence that matters for better healthcare and publishing original research that affects practice.

Authors

BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine accepts submissions of a wide range of article types, including original research, debate, analysis & opinion, and clinical spotlight.

Read more about our content in the Welcome to BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine Editorial.

The Author Information section provides specific article requirements to help you turn your research into an article.

Information is also provided on editorial policies and open access.

Author information

Submit a paper

Intro Widget

Authors

Latest Content

Commentary:

Frailty and frailty-related factors are associated with postoperative complications in older patients undergoing elective surgery

Commentary:

Deprescribing cardiovascular drugs in low-risk patients increases the risk of uncontrolled blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol

Commentary:

Hormone therapy should not be prescribed for primary prevention of chronic medical conditions in asymptomatic postmenopausal women

Commentary:

Uncertainty surrounds anticoagulation risks and benefits in patients with chronic kidney disease with atrial fibrillation

EBM analysis:

Shared decision is the only outcome that matters when it comes to evaluating evidence-based practice

Editor’s Choice

Evidence synthesis:

Prevention of exacerbations in patients with stable non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies

Commentary:

Intensive versus standard blood pressure treatment improves cardiovascular outcomes without any difference in patient-reported outcomes

Editorial:

Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM

EBM Learning:

Verification bias

Correction:

Correction: What does expert opinion in guidelines mean? a meta-epidemiological study

Blog Posts

Most Read Articles

Editorial:

Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn’t

Editorial:

Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM

EBM analysis:

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development

EBM opinion and debate:

Learning framework for implementing best evidence

Research methods and reporting:

The effect of publication bias magnitude and direction on the certainty in evidence