Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Review: important bedside predictors are patient’s description of chest pain for CAD and electrocardiography for MI

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

 Q What is the accuracy of bedside findings for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute myocardial infarction (MI)?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★☆☆ Internal Medicine ★★★★☆☆☆ GP/FP/Emergency Medicine ★★★★☆☆☆ Emergency Medicine ★★★★★☆☆ Cardiology ★★★★★★☆


Embedded ImageData sources:

Medline (1966 to January 2003) and reference lists.

Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

English language studies that included patients with symptoms suggestive of CAD, clearly defined clinical findings, had an independent comparison of the bedside finding with an acceptable diagnostic standard, and reported sufficient data to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs). Studies were pooled using the random effects model.

Embedded ImageOutcomes:

detection of CAD (cardiac catheterisation showing substantial stenosis of any major epicardial vessel) or MI …

View Full Text


  • For correspondence: Dr A A Chun, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

  • Source of funding: not stated

Linked Articles

  • Glossary
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd