Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Review: a low clinical probability plus a normal D-dimer test result excludes a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis

Statistics from

 Q In patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT), is a combination of rapid D-dimer testing with estimation of clinical probability accurate for excluding a diagnosis of DVT?

Clinical impact ratings IM/Ambulatory care ★★★★★★☆ Internal medicine ★★★★★★☆ Emergency Medicine ★★★★★☆☆ Haematology ★★★★★☆☆


Embedded ImageData sources:

Medline (1993–2003), Database of Abstracts and Reviews, and bibliographies of relevant articles.

Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

prospective studies (published in English) that used a rapid D-dimer assay on at least a subgroup of consecutive outpatients with features of DVT; estimated the risk of DVT using a validated clinical probability tool that categorised patients as having low, intermediate, or high risk of DVT; evaluated outpatient data separately if inpatients were included; evaluated DVT data separately if patients with pulmonary embolism were included; had 100% patient follow up at ⩾3 months; documented DVT using ultrasonography, venography, or impedance plethsmography; and presented sufficient data for calculation of sensitivity and specificity of the D-dimer assay …

View Full Text

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.