Article Text

Review: commonly recommended well-child care interventions are not supported by evidence

Statistics from

 Q What is the evidence base for commonly recommended clinical preventive services for children?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆ Paediatrics ★★★★★★☆


Embedded ImageData sources:

Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ACP Journal Club, PsycINFO, reference lists, proceedings of the Pediatric Academic Societies (1997–2003), internet, and contact with experts.

Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

high quality systematic reviews were sought. Randomized and controlled clinical trials published after a review’s search dates were then sought. If no reviews existed, clinical trials were sought for all dates. Studies and reviews had to evaluate a well-child care intervention in healthy children between birth and 18–21 years of age. Exclusion criteria: studies assessing only change in health knowledge and attitudes, studies in non-clinical settings (eg, schools), and studies using tests for diagnosis or management rather than screening.

Embedded ImageOutcomes:

prevention of disease/disability, improvements in health/wellbeing, developmental and behavioural outcomes, and healthy behaviours.


A table on the website summarises the evidence ( Behavioural counselling. Several high quality systematic reviews and trials evaluated injury prevention. A modest benefit was seen …

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • The table is available as a downloadable PDF (printer friendly file).

    If you do not have Adobe Reader installed on your computer,
    you can download this free-of-charge, please Click here


    Files in this Data Supplement:

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.