Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Intensified blood pressure (BP) control was not better than conventional BP control in non-diabetic chronic renal disease
Free

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 Q In patients with non-diabetic nephropathy and persistent proteinuria, is an intensified blood pressure (BP) control programme more effective than conventional BP control for slowing progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD)?

Clinical impact ratings Nephrology ★★★★★★★

METHODS

Embedded ImageDesign:

randomised controlled trial (Ramipril Efficacy In Nephropathy [REIN] 2 trial).

Embedded ImageAllocation:

concealed.*

Embedded ImageBlinding:

unblinded.*

Embedded ImageFollow up period:

median 19 months (total follow up period 36 mo).

Embedded ImageSetting:

29 centres in Bulgaria, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland.

Embedded ImagePatients:

338 patients (age range 18–70 years) with non-diabetic nephropathy and persistent proteinuria (ie, a proteinuria of 1–3 g/d and creatinine clearance <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, or proteinuria ⩾3 g/d and creatinine clearance <70 ml/min per 1.73 m2) who had not received angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition treatment for ⩾6 weeks. Exclusion criteria …

View Full Text

Linked Articles

  • Glossary
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd