Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evidently ...
  1. RICHARD LEHMAN, MRCGP, MA
  1. Department of Primary Care, Oxford University
 Oxford, UK

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The world of cardiology has been in turmoil ever since the first studies which showed that immediate angioplasty is superior to thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Even on an overcrowded island like Britain, most people do not live within easy distance of a cardiac catheter facility, and even in a resource rich country like the USA, there aren’t enough cardiologists to provide a 24 hour immediate angiography service. A thorough systematic review and economic analysis in the British

    finds that 6 month mortality is reduced by about one third, and reinfarction by a half, but that these benefits may be lost if door-to-balloon time is more than an hour longer than door-to-needle time. But a German trial published in found a benefit even in patients presenting more than 12 hours from the first symptoms of myocardial infarction. Fortunately, there is growing evidence that thrombolysis followed by invasive treatment may achieve most of the benefits of …

    View Full Text