Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Dental restoration with amalgam was not worse than resin composite material for children’s health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


 
 Q In children with caries, does dental restoration with amalgam adversely affect neuropsychological and renal functions?

Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆

METHODS

Embedded ImageDesign:

randomised controlled trial.

Embedded ImageAllocation:

concealed.*

Embedded ImageBlinding:

blinded (data collectors and data analysts).*

Embedded ImageFollow up period:

5 years.

Embedded ImageSetting:

5 community health dental clinics in New England in the US.

Embedded ImagePatients:

534 children 6–10 years of age (mean age 7.9 y, 54% girls) who had ⩾2 posterior teeth with dental caries; had no previous amalgam restoration; and were not previously diagnosed with psychological, behavioural, neurological, immunosuppressive, or renal disease.

Embedded ImageIntervention:

amalgam (n = 267) or resin composite material (n = 267). Resin composite material was used to restore caries in the front teeth for all children. Stainless steel crowns were used to restore primary …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • * See glossary.

  • For correspondence: Dr S M McKinlay, New England Research Institute Inc, Watertown, MA, USA. smckinlay{at}neriscience.com

  • Sources of funding: New England Research Institutes and National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.

Linked Articles

  • Glossary
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd