Statistics from Altmetric.com
Q In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) more effective for preventing cardiovascular events than OMT alone?
Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★★ Internal medicine ★★★★★★☆ Cardiology ★★★★★★☆
randomised controlled trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation [COURAGE] trial).
unclear allocation concealment.*
blinded (outcome adjudication committee).*
Follow up period:
median 4.6 years (range 2.5–7.0 y).
50 centres in the US and Canada.
2287 patients (mean age 62 y, 85% men) with stable CAD (stenosis ⩾70% in ⩾1 proximal epicardial coronary artery and objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia, or ⩾1 coronary stenosis ⩾80% and classic angina without provocative testing). Exclusion criteria included persistent class IV angina, a markedly positive stress test, refractory heart failure or cardiogenic shock, ejection fraction <30%, revascularisation in ⩽6 …
↵* See glossary.
For correspondence: Dr W E Boden, Buffalo General Hospital, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sources of funding: US Department of Veterans Affairs; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Merck; Pfizer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Fujisawa; Kos Pharmaceuticals; Datascope; Astra-Zeneca; Key Pharmaceutical; Sanofi-Aventis; First Horizon; GE Healthcare.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.