Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Hatcher S, Butler R, Oakley-Browne M. Evidence-based mental health care. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
  1. Vinod Srihari, MD
  1. Yale University School of Medicine
 New Haven, Connecticut, USA

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Intellectuals have a choice to make…: they can either become demagogues and treat ideas as “swords against enemies,” or they can be teachers and use ideas as “plowshares to loosen the soil of contemplative thought.” - Max Weber (in Science as Vocation, 1946)

    The appellation “evidence-based” is fast becoming de rigueur in any discussion on mental health care. Judging from the variety of uses to which it is put, however, one could be excused for mistaking it as simply a way to win an argument by intimidation (“I have read the evidence, which you clearly have not!”). I was attracted to the evidence-based medicine (EBM) approach as a medical student because of the explicit and transparent approach it offered toward clinical ignorance (my own) and uncertainty (in the available knowledge base) and the relief it offered in being able to tell the 2 apart! Since then I have turned to this approach often in my practice of clinical psychiatry, both as a way to make decisions in the face of considerable uncertainty and as a framework to teach about how to use population data for individual patient care. In this …

    View Full Text