Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Q In patients with knee injury, how accurate are clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing meniscus tears compared with arthroscopy? Can MRI be used to reduce the number of patients with negative arthroscopy?
Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆ Rheumatology ★★★★★☆☆ Surgery–orthopaedics ★★★★★☆☆ Emergency Medicine ★★★★☆☆☆
Cochrane Library, PubMed (including the “related articles” feature), and reference lists.
Study selection and assessment:
English language, prospective, cohort studies reporting on a consecutive series of ⩾40 patients with suspected meniscus tears with a universally applied gold standard (arthroscopy). Studies considered to have substantial bias were excluded. 26 studies (n = 3386, range of mean age 19–50 y, range of ages 10–87 y) (plus an additional 6 studies in specific populations) met the selection criteria: 6 (n = 825) evaluating clinical tests, 8 (n = 684) evaluating MRI, and 12 (n = 1877) evaluating whether MRI could reduce the use of arthroscopy. …
For correspondence: Dr R L Bartz, Nebraska Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Source of funding: not stated