Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Continuous positive airways pressure was better than an oral appliance or conservative measures for mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

M S Ip

Professor M S Ip, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; msmip@hkucc.hku.hk

STUDY DESIGN

Design:

3-group randomised controlled trial.

Allocation:

unconcealed.*

Blinding:

unblinded.*

STUDY QUESTION

Setting:

sleep laboratories at a university and a regional hospital in Hong Kong, China.

Patients:

101 patients (mean age 46 y, 78% men) with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ⩾5–40 and, for those with AHI scores of 5–20, an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score >9. Exclusion criteria included excessive sleepiness, unstable medical diseases, and sleep disorders other than OSA.

Intervention:

(i) continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) at a pretitrated pressure and conservative measures (CM) consisting of advice on sleep hygiene and prescription to attend a weight control programme if necessary (n = 34); (ii) a tailor-made, non-adjustable, Harvold type, oral appliance that …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: Health Services Research Committee, Hong Kong.