Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Active management of risk in pregnancy at term did not reduce caesarean delivery rates

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

J M Nicholson

Dr J M Nicholson, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; james.nicholsonmd@uphs.upenn.edu

STUDY DESIGN

Design:

randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Allocation:

concealed.*

Blinding:

unblinded.*

STUDY QUESTION

Setting:

3 centres in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Patients:

281 pregnant women (mean age 23 y, 88% African-American) who remained undelivered at 37 weeks 4 days of gestation and had ⩾1 of 6 risk factors for caesarean delivery: age ⩾35 years, height ⩽157 cm, body mass index ⩾30 kg/m2, blood pressure elevation or anaemia in the first trimester, or history of a large fetus. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, previous caesarean delivery, placenta previa, HIV infection, and contraindication to labour.

Intervention:

women were managed in late pregnancy according to the active management of risk in pregnancy at term (AMOR-IPAT) method (n = 136) or usual care (n = 134). AMOR-IPAT involves 3 steps: (1) a risk scoring system to …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and First Hospital Foundation.