Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evidence in context: one person’s poison is another’s acceptable risk
  1. R Brian Haynes,
  2. Lawrence Hart
  1. McMaster University; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Seeing a patient who might be having an adverse effect of a medication may lead to a clash of perspectives. For example, from the viewpoint of a cardiologist caring for someone with an acute coronary syndrome, it is all too easy to blame the internist or rheumatologist who prescribed a cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor for a patient’s arthritis. This is yet another example of “practice variation,” or slow knowledge translation. However, such a judgement ignores the complexity of the evidence that putatively links COX-2 inhibitors to heart disease. To be sure, there is evidence that COX-2 inhibitors can increase risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, but what may be overlooked is that the extent of such risk varies substantively among patients, depending on the drug, dose, dosing frequency, duration, and outcome definition. Furthermore, the balance of benefits and risks for patients depends on their unique clinical states and circumstances,1 the success or failure of alternatives, and the patient’s wishes.2 Applying the …

    View Full Text


    • Competing interests: Dr. Haynes declares no competing interests concerning the topic of this editorial. Dr. Hart was involved in industry-sponsored trials of celecoxib and valdecoxib before 2002; he has had no competing interests since 2002.