Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Clinical diagnosis of vaginitis was moderately accurate in symptomatic women

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

STUDY QUESTION

In women with vulvovaginal symptoms, how accurate is a clinical diagnosis of vaginitis?

STUDY DESIGN

Design:

blinded comparison of clinical diagnosis with DNA probe analysis.

Setting:

4 US military medical clinics.

Patients:

535 women 18–50 years of age (mean age 26 y) who presented with vulvovaginal symptoms (51% with abnormal discharge, 33% with itching/irritation, 10% with malodour, and 4% with vulvar burning). Women who were menstruating or had had coitus in <24 hours were excluded.

Description of test:

standard clinical diagnosis by a nurse practitioner consisting of history; physical examination; and pH determination, amines (whiff) test, and wet-prep microscopy of vaginal secretions.

Diagnostic standard:

DNA probe analysis on vaginal secretions for Gardnerella vaginalis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and candida species.

Outcomes:

sensitivity, …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: National Institute of Nursing Research.