Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Selecting “Aetiology” articles for the Evidence-Based Medicine journal
  1. Paul Glasziou1,
  2. Susan Marks2,
  3. for the Evidence-Based Journals team2
  1. 1University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  2. 2McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The EBM journal’s “Purpose and procedures” page spells out our screening rules to check whether an article is sufficiently valid. Articles that meet the criteria go out for rating by our database of reviewers. We recently described the full process that involves over 160 journals, 60 000 articles per year, and a rating community of over 4000 clinicians.1

As we are always looking for ways to improve the process, we periodically review our procedures for selecting articles for the EBM journal. Recently, we revised our approach to aetiology articles: articles that look at the association between a predictive factor and an outcome. Sometimes those predictive factors are treatments, so there is a potential overlap with …

View Full Text