You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 16, Issue 1
  • Meta-analysis finds screening for prostate cancer with PSA does not reduce prostate cancer–related or all-cause mortality but results likely due to heterogeneity – the two highest quality studies identified do find prostate cancer–related mortality reduc…

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Diagnosis
Systematic review
Meta-analysis finds screening for prostate cancer with PSA does not reduce prostate cancer–related or all-cause mortality but results likely due to heterogeneity – the two highest quality studies identified do find prostate cancer–related mortality reductions
  1. Monique J Roobol1,
  2. Sigrid Carlsson2,
  3. Jonas Hugosson2
  1. 1Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Urology, Institute of clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Monique J Roobol
    Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; m.roobol{at}erasmusmc.nl

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm1165

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Commentary on:

    1. Djulbegovic M,
    2. Beyth RJ,
    3. Neuberger MM,
    4. et al
    . Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2010;341:c4543.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

    Screening for prostate cancer is controversial. Although screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may identify cancer at an early stage, questions remain regarding the impact of screening on mortality and other important clinical outcomes.

    Djulbegovic and colleagues performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing PSA-based screening with or without digital rectal examination versus no screening including nearly 400 000 asymptomatic men. Six trials met the eligibility criteria and were included in analyses on overall and disease-specific mortality and, if possible, in an analysis on clinical stage at the time of diagnosis.

    The authors found that screening was associated with an increased probability of receiving a diagnosis of prostate cancer (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.77, p<0.001) and stage I prostate cancer (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.13, p=0.005). There was no significant effect of screening on death from prostate cancer (RR 0.88, 0.71 to 1.09, p=0.25) or overall mortality (RR 0.99, 0.97 to 1.01, p=0.44), and all trials included …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.