Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Intraoperative complications are more common with laparoscopic than with open colorectal surgery
  1. Tommie Mynster
  1. Department of Surgery K, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Tommie Mynster
    Department of Surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400-NV Copenhagen, Denmark; d254401{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science


The absence of digital manipulation of tissue and thereby the loss of informing input for the surgeon is a consequence of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Presentation and care of the pathologic organ and surroundings could be compromised when metallic instruments replace the fingers. However, numerous reports have shown equal outcome results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. But if intraoperative organ injury is more common in laparoscopic colorectal procedures, attention would need to be directed towards its prevention.


This was a meta-analysis of available randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating laparoscopic versus open surgery for any colonic or rectal indication. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery was excluded. The literature search was based on Cochrane strategies and included studies until August 2009. If no complication data …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.