Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cohort study
Identifying streptococcal throat infections in primary care: more guidance but uncertainty remains
  1. Anne G M Schilder1,2,3,
  2. Roderick P Venekamp2,3
  1. 1 UCL ENT Clinical Trials Programme, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  3. 3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to : Prof dr Anne G M Schilder
    UCL ENT Clinical Trials Programme, Ear Institute, University College London, UCL Rockefeller Building Room 233, 21 University Street, London WC1E 6DE, UK; a.schilder{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed


Acute pharyngitis is among the most common reasons for primary care visits.1 Although current evidence suggests that antibiotics have some beneficial effects on symptoms in patients suffering from acute sore throat, in particular in those with Lancefield group A β-haemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infections, the absolute benefits are marginal, as almost 90% of treated and untreated patients are symptom free by 1 week.2 Criteria from the research of Centor et al 3 are most commonly used to predict GABHS infection in patients suffering from acute sore throat. The use of these criteria, however, leads to high antibiotic prescription rates in particular because of their …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.