You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 19, Issue 3
  • Study shows insufficient decrease in wound complications with sutured versus stapled skin closure in gastrointestinal operations

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Therapeutics
Randomised controlled trial
Study shows insufficient decrease in wound complications with sutured versus stapled skin closure in gastrointestinal operations
  1. Hong Vo,
  2. Cindy Kin
  1. Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Cindy Kin, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3680 Stanford, CA 94305, USA; cindykin{at}stanford.edu
View Full Text

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101626

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Commentary on: Tsujinaka T, Yamamoto K, Fujita J, et al. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:1105–12.OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Context

    Postoperative wound complications can occur in 9–26% of gastrointestinal operations.1–3 Skin closure with subcuticular sutures in clean operations, such as caesarean sections, are associated with decreased wound complications and increased patient satisfaction when compared with skin closure using staples.4 ,5 Whether these results are applicable to clean–contaminated operations is unknown. Tsujinaka and colleagues examined the incidence of wound complications after open gastrointestinal operations in patients undergoing skin closure with subcuticular sutures versus staples.

    Methods

    This …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Copyright information:

    Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions