Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Randomised controlled trial
Menopausal hormone therapy has risks and benefits during the intervention and poststopping phase
  1. Michelle P Warren
  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Michelle P Warren, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street; New York, NY 10032, USA; mpw1{at}columbia.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

Context

Earlier studies have presented the outcomes of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), which enrolled women aged 50–79 years and included a trial of conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and a CEE-alone trial.1,2 Most participants stopped hormone therapy at the end for the formal trial with less than 4% continuing therapy. Most of the data reflects a median of 5.6 years of exposure for CEE+MPA and 7.2 years of exposure for CEE. This report summarises the previous WHI reports alongside 13 years of follow-up in 81.1% of surviving participants. Some selection bias may have occurred in the postintervention phase due to occurrences in the intervention phase.

Methods

Women were recruited from 1993 …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests MPW is a consultant for Pfizer Pharmaceutical.