You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letter
Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research
  1. Rachel Shaw
  1. School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Rachel Shaw
    School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; r.l.shaw{at}aston.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2

    Since writing our …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles