Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Commentary on: OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text.
Context
In cases of severe intermittent claudication (IC), successful revascularisation provides significant symptomatic improvement. In cases of mild IC, revascularisation has exceedingly high risks. The choice between invasive revascularisation and non-invasive treatments for moderate severity IC is often difficult. Treatment benefits may be relative in terms of the effects on quality of life (QoL).
Methods
This trial randomised consecutive patients with moderate IC into two equal groups to compare the effects of revascularisation and non-invasive treatment on health-related QoL assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQoL). Self-reported maximum walking distance (MWD) and IC distance (ICD) on a …
Footnotes
Twitter Follow Andrew Kurklinsky at @kurklinsky
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.