Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Randomised controlled trial
The addition of abdomen and pelvis CT to limited cancer screening does not increase diagnosis of cancer in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism
  1. Matthew T Rondina,
  2. Kencee Kay Graves
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Matthew Rondina, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, USA; matthew.rondina{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed


In patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism, occult malignancy is of concern. Studies have shown that more than 60% of occult cancers are diagnosed following unprovoked venous thromboembolism and up to 10% of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism are diagnosed with cancer within the following year.1 Despite this, the approach to evaluating patients for occult malignancy varies widely. Studies have described a limited technique of history, physical examination and laboratory tests, as well as utilising multimodal imaging techniques to detect cancer in these patients.2 ,3 Carrier and colleagues compared comprehensive and limited occult-cancer screening strategies in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.


This multicentre, randomised trial …

View Full Text


  • Twitter Follow Matthew Rondina at @rondina_lab

  • Contributors This invited commentary was authored by KKG with editing by MTR. Both authors were involved in the planning, conduct and reporting of the work described in the article.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.