You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Therapeutics/Prevention
Randomised controlled trial
High-dose vitamin D supplementation does not alter bone mass or muscle function over 1 year in postmenopausal women
  1. Nicholas C Harvey1,2,
  2. Cyrus Cooper1,2,3
  1. 1MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;
  2. 2NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;
  3. 3NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to : Professor Cyrus Cooper, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; cc{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2015-110328

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Commentary on: Hansen KE, Johnson RE, Chambers KR, et al. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal women: a randomised clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1612–21.OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Context

    As recent systematic reviews have demonstrated, associations documented in observational studies between low vitamin D status and a wide range of disease outcomes have generally not been borne out by randomised control trials conducted thus far1; even for the traditional vitamin D-related outcomes of bone mineralisation and muscle function, such intervention studies have not provided a uniform message.2 Indeed there is continued controversy regarding what constitutes an optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration [(25OH)D].3

    Methods

    Against this backdrop, Hanson et al aimed to …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.