Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter in reply to ‘Evidence pyramids’ from Dr Kaufmann
  1. Brian S Alper1,
  2. Brian R Haynes2
  1. 1 Department of DynaMed, EBSCO Health, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Brian S Alper
    , Department of DynaMed, EBSCO Health, 10 Estes Street, Ipswich, MA 01938, USA; balper{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Dr Kaufmann1 suggests that readers should use the ‘New Evidence Pyramid’ which conveys a hierarchy of quality across primary studies2 rather than the ‘EBHC Pyramid 5.0’ which conveys a hierarchy of comprehensiveness across types of information resources (primary studies, systematic reviews, guidelines and synthesised summaries for clinical reference).3 However, these pyramids are complementary and address very different issues. The hierarchy of validity of primary studies (and the recognition that quality varies so the hierarchy …

View Full Text


  • Twitter Follow Brian Alper at @BrianAlperMD

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles