Article Text

Download PDFPDF
94 Under- versus overdiagnosis: exploring the benefits and harms of a PCOS label and its impact on women’s psychosocial wellbeing, lifestyle and behaviour
  1. Tessa Copp1,
  2. Jolyn Hersch1,
  3. Kirsten McCaffery1,
  4. Jenny Doust2,
  5. Anuja Dokras3,
  6. Ben Mol4,
  7. Jesse Jansen1
  1. 1Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Wiser Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
  3. 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  4. 4Monash University, Melbourne, Australia


Objectives Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) were expanded in 2003, resulting in the inclusion of women with milder forms and a substantial increase in the total number of women diagnosed. This has raised concerns about overdiagnosis and unnecessary disease labelling. PCOS is associated with adverse reproductive, metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, however not all women fitting the expanded criteria may be at risk of these. Women with PCOS also have higher rates of psychological distress than their peers. However, it is unclear whether this is due to the condition, its symptoms, or the psychological impact of being labelled with PCOS. We aimed to explore the benefits and harms of a PCOS label from the perspective of women diagnosed with PCOS who vary across the spectrum of disease severity, and investigate how the diagnosis affected their psychosocial wellbeing, lifestyle choices and behaviour.

Method Women diagnosed with PCOS aged 18–45 in Australia were recruited via Facebook. We conducted 25 semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews. Topics included experience with diagnosis and management, doctor-patient communication, information provision and diagnostic satisfaction, perceived benefits and harms of diagnosis, and impact of the diagnosis on psychological wellbeing, life decisions, behaviour and social environment. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results Women expressed a range of experiences regarding the diagnosis and management of their condition. Perceived benefits included validation and explanation of bothersome symptoms, increased understanding about their body and why it behaves in certain ways, and better access to treatment. Perceived harms included increased worry and anxiety about the future, and misperceptions and confusion about fertility, which resulted in unplanned pregnancies among some women. Adverse impacts on self-esteem and relationships were also reported, as well as significant out of pocket costs for specialist appointments, screening tests and medication.

Conclusions Diagnostic criteria for PCOS have expanded without clear evidence of benefit. It is vital the benefits and harms of a diagnosis for women across the spectrum of symptom severity are investigated. Participants interviewed in this study described various positive and negative impacts of a diagnosis on their lives, which were influenced by factors such as symptom severity, communication at diagnosis and their relationships with their clinicians. The implications of these findings for future research and clinical practice will be discussed.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.