Article Text

Download PDFPDF
104 Reducing unwarranted variations in frequency of coronary angiographies in germany by describing, understanding and modifying local practice
  1. Navina Gerlach1,
  2. Kathrin Schlößler1,
  3. Joana Steinbuck1,
  4. Julian Bleek2,
  5. Christian Günster3,
  6. Ursula Marschall4,
  7. Udo Schneider5,
  8. Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag5,
  9. Leonie Sundmacher6,
  10. Hans-Helmut König7,
  11. Uwe Zeymer8,
  12. Steffen Schneider8,
  13. Karl Werdan9,
  14. Michael Weber9,
  15. Corinna Schäfer10,
  16. David Klemperer11,
  17. Ina Kopp12,
  18. Monika Nothacker13,
  19. Norbert Donner-Banzhoff1
  1. 1Department of Family Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
  2. 2Federal Association of the Local Health Care Funds (AOK), Berlin, Germany
  3. 3Research Institute of the Local Health Care Funds (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
  4. 4BARMER (Health Care Insurance), Wuppertal, Germany
  5. 5Scientific Institute of TK (Health Care Insurance) for Benefit and Efficiency in Health Care (WINEG), Hamburg, Germany
  6. 6Department of Health Services Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  7. 7Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany
  8. 8Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (IHF), Ludwigshafen, Germany
  9. 9German Cardiac Society, Düsseldorf, Germany
  10. 10German Agency for Quality in Medicine, Berl, Germany
  11. 11OTH Regensburg – Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  12. 12Standing Guideline Commission of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF); Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Marburg, Germany
  13. 13Standing Guideline Commission of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), Berlin, Germany


Objectives Germany has one of the highest numbers of coronary angiography worldwide. Nevertheless, we find a great variation between German regions for both, diagnostic coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We assume that this variation is not only due to variation in morbidity but also reflects factors such as guideline adherence, physician-patient communication and access to care.

In this mixed method project, we aim to first describe the variation of coronary angiographies and PCIs in different German regions. Secondly, we explore current practices and motives for (non-)adherences to guidelines in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected CHD. Based on these results, we consequently plan to develop a complex intervention (treatment pathway) to improve guideline adherence and thus appropriateness of coronary angiography.

Method The projects will be organized according to the recommendation of the Medical Research Council for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. The first study will use descriptive methods based on routine data of three German Health Care Insurances and registry data to describe status quo and associated factors of coronary angiography. The second study will use qualitative methods to understand barriers and facilitators of guideline adherence and medical decision making. Furthermore, we will discuss variations in care and thereby identify implementation targets for the planned treatment pathway. Based on this information, we will develop local treatment pathways in four selected regions. Relevant peers will develop the local pathway in group discussions. Using this bottom-up approach, we directly address implementation challenges.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.