Article Text

Download PDFPDF
General medicine
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in older patients with heart failure
  1. Anthony T Sharkey1,
  2. Mohd Zaquan Ghafar1,
  3. Shaun T O’Keeffe1,
  4. Eamon C Mulkerrin1,2
  1. 1 Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
  2. 2 Department of Medicine, Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Professor Eamon C Mulkerrin, Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland; eamon.mulkerrin{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


Heart failure affects approximately 1.5% of the adult population in developed countries and the prevalence rises to almost 10% in those over 70 years, a progressively increasing subset of the population.1 2 Sacubitril/Valsartan (an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor—ARNi) was introduced as a novel agent for heart failure in 2014. Should this novel agent be tolerated and prove efficacious in older patients with heart failure?

Evolution of neprilysin inhibitors

ACE inhibitors were first reported as beneficial more than 25 years ago and have been the mainstay of therapy for heart failure since then.3 A combination of ACE inhibitors with beta blockers4 and aldosterone antagonists5 has contributed to best medical management during the intervening period. Therapeutic manipulation of the third neurohormonal system involving the natriuretic peptides has been evaluated over many years. While these peptides have been reported to cause effects such as vasodilation, suppression of aldosterone secretion, natriuresis and diuresis, all of which should be beneficial in heart failure, early studies in humans resulted in disappointing outcomes. For example, neprilysin inhibitors given alone did not produce clinically beneficial effects probably because neprilysin is also responsible for the breakdown of other polypeptide vasoconstrictors such as angiotensin II, thus negating any beneficial effects.6 Moreover the combination of neprilysin inhibitors and ACE inhibitors was demonstrated as potentially detrimental due to the increased propensity to angiooedema probably related to excess bradykinin (also degraded by neprilysin) levels.7 8

Paradigm study

When the PARADIGM-HF study prospectively compared Sacubitril/Valsartan with an ACE inhibitor (enalapril), with a view to determining the impact of those therapies on mortality and morbidity in heart failure, there was a significant reduction in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.9 Moreover, there was a significant diminution in the rate of hospitalisation with worsening heart failure and these effects are detailed in table 1.

View this table:
Table 1

Positive …

View Full Text


  • Contributors This article was composed and edited by four medical doctors in the Department of Geriatric Medicine within Galway University Hospital. ATS (Geriatric Intern) and MZG (Geriatric registrar) organised review of literature references and carried out the initial preliminary draft. STO’K (Consultant Geriatrician) reviewed and edited early drafts. ECM (Consultant Geriatrician) proposed the idea for the paper, performed supervision of data and carried out final editing.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement This review article was composed and edited by the authors. It has not been submitted for review or published elsewhere.