Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Physicians are increasingly required to implement evidence-based clinical decision-making, underpinning the importance of an evidence-based medical curriculum. Some medical schools in the USA have incorporated training in evidence-based medicine (EBM) into their preclinical curricula in an attempt to prepare students for evidence-based practice. Evidence supports the incorporation of EBM training into the preclinical medical school curricula, as increased exposure to EBM during these years has been found to increase both the medical students’ perceived self-efficacy in practising EBM and the likelihood that they will continue to implement evidence-based practices.1 Despite these benefits, there is also evidence that current curricula are incomplete and only partially effective. For example, one study found that prior to graduation, US medical students in their final year of medical school were only able to demonstrate an understanding of 50% of the EBM principles that were evaluated.2 Furthermore, underdeveloped research skills may leave healthcare professionals unable to implement evidence-based clinical decisions since they are unable to evaluate the accuracy, reliability and credibility of research findings.3
To address step four of the Evidence-Based Medicine Manifesto,4 we have implemented a research team at Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences composed of medical students and physicians …
Contributors According to the ICJME recommendations for authorship, each author involved in the writing of this manuscript provided substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement There are no additional unpublished data associated with this manuscript.