Methodological quality and redundancy of systematic reviews that compare endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid stenosis | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

EBM Analysis

Surgery

Methodological quality and redundancy of systematic reviews that compare endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid stenosis

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Mendoza JFW, Latorraca CDOC, Oliveira RDÁ, et al

Methodological quality and redundancy of systematic reviews that compare endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid stenosis

BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2021;26:14-18.