Knowledge synthesis constitutes a key part of evidence-based medicine and a scoping review is a type of knowledge synthesis that maps the breadth of literature on a topic. Conducting a scoping review is resource intensive and, as a result, it can be challenging to maintain best practices throughout the process. Much of the current guidance describes a scoping review framework or broad ways to conduct a scoping review. However, little detailed guidance exists on how to complete each stage to optimise the process. We present five recommendations based on our experience when conducting a particularly challenging scoping review: (1) engage the expertise of a librarian throughout the process, (2) conduct a truly systematic search, (3) facilitate communication and collaboration, (4) explore new tools or repurpose old ones, and (5) test every stage of the process. These recommendations add to the literature by providing specific and detailed advice on each stage of a scoping review. Our intent is for these recommendations to aid other teams that are undertaking knowledge synthesis projects.
- information science
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors CP participated in the conceptualisation of the project, wrote the initial manuscript draft and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. HLB, KW, TD, A-MH, M-CG, RS and HS participated in the conceptualisation the project and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Funding The scoping review referenced in this paper was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Knowledge Synthesis Grant #328968.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.