Article Text

Download PDFPDF
8 EBM and the opioid epidemic
  1. Abhimanyu Sud1,2,3,
  2. Ross Upshur1,4,5
  1. 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  2. 2Medical Psychiatry Alliance, Toronto, Canada
  3. 3Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada
  4. 4Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  5. 5Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Toronto, Canada


This workshop will provide participants a hands-on opportunity to explore and reflect on the relationship between evidence, and specifically evidence based medicine, and the contemporary North American opioid epidemics. EBM emerged through the late twentieth century to promote good (conscientious, explicit and judicious) use of best evidence to inform clinical decision making. By the 1990s it was an established and dominant paradigm informing North American clinical practice. The 1990s and 2000s also saw a massive increase in the use of prescribed opioids for the management of pain. This was despite there being little good evidence for their efficacy and safety for chronic pain management. Harms from opioids continued to mount through the 2000s, prompting increasing scholarship into their safety. By 2010, Canada had its first national clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the use of opioids for chronic pain management, followed in 2016 by the Centres for Disease Control in the United States and then by an update of the Canadian guidelines in 2017. Neither country has yet seen a comprehensive CPG for the management of chronic non-cancer pain. In this workshop, we will use first a historical perspective and then a population health perspective to critically examine the role of evidence, and specifically evidence synthesis in the form of CPGs, vis-à-vis opioid use and the population level opioid-related harms. From a historical perspective, we will draw on some of our current bibliometric research of a highly cited pre-EBM opioid prescribing guideline and compare this to the content of a contemporary (‘EBM-informed’) CPG. Participants will work individually and in small groups to examine, compare and contrast specific recommendations from these two guidelines, published more than 30 years apart. This will provide an opportunity to reflect on the value and utility of using current best evidence versus expert opinion to inform guideline development. The second half of this workshop will take a population health perspective and focus on a set of highly influential Canadian and American studies into the dose-related harms of prescribed opioids. Participants will trace the path from the publication of these studies to their synthesis in CPGs in the form of specific recommendations for opioid dosing. We will consider the particular form in which the study data were interpreted and how this influenced guideline recommendations. Participants will be offered the opportunity to use alternate modes of analysing the same data, for example from population health perspectives. We will then consider whether and how these different modes of analysis could influence clinical practice recommendations.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.