Article info
PDFEBM opinion and debate
The Pandora’s Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy
- Correspondence to Dr Zachary Munn, JBI, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; zachary.munn{at}adelaide.edu.au
Citation
The Pandora’s Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy
Publication history
- Accepted September 30, 2022
- First published October 14, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 22, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 May 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.