Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Tamoxifen added to lumpectomy and radiation therapy reduced breast cancer events in ductal carcinoma in situ
  1. Edith A Perez, MD
  1. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida, USA
    1. Bernard Fisher, MD

      Statistics from

      Request Permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

 QUESTION: In women with non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), does adding tamoxifen to lumpectomy and radiation therapy (RT) prevent cancer in ipsilateral and contralateral breasts?


      Randomised {allocation concealed*}, blinded {clinicians, patients, outcome assessors, and statisticians*}, placebo controlled trial with median 74 month follow up.


      57 centres in the United States and Canada.


      1804 women who had lumpectomy for DCIS, including those with or without lobular carcinoma in situ, and who were expected to live ≥10 years. 16% had positive resection margins. Women with previously diagnosed cancer other than in situ carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin were excluded. Follow up was 99.7%.


      Lumpectomy and RT (50 Gy) began within 8 weeks of surgery and were allocated to tamoxifen, 10 mg twice/d for 5 years (n=902), or placebo (n=902).

      Main outcome measures

      Invasive or non-invasive tumours as first events in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast.

      Main results

      Fewer breast cancer events, both invasive and non-invasive, occurred in women who received tamoxifen than in those who received placebo (p<0.001) (table). Use of tamoxifen reduced invasive events in the ipsilateral breast (p=0.03) and non-invasive events in the contralateral breast (p=0.02) (table). For total breast cancer events, 20 women would need to be treated with tamoxifen for 5 years to prevent 1 additional occurrence of breast cancer. At 5 years, survival was 97% in each group (p=0.74).

      Lumpectomy, radiation therapy (RT), and tamoxifen v lumpectomy, RT, and placebo to prevent first breast cancer events at 5 years‡


      In women with ductal carcinoma in situ, the addition of tamoxifen to a treatment regimen of lumpectomy and radiation therapy was effective in preventing cancer in the ipsilateral and contralateral breast at 5 years without affecting survival.


      Fisher and colleagues show that tamoxifen therapy for 5 years adds to the benefit of lumpectomy and radiation in women with DCIS. Some parts of this study, however, merit discussion before it can be concluded that tamoxifen should be recommended for all women with DCIS.

      Tamoxifen decreased the rate of invasive breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast (absolute reduction of 2.1%, from 4.2% to 2.1%). For enrolment, pathological margins of resection for cancer could be either negative or positive, and 16% of patients had involved residual surgical margins. Patients with residual scattered mammographic calcifications were also eligible for enrolment. Margins of resection have been shown to correlate with recurrence in previous retrospective studies. For example, a non-randomised trial by Silverstein and colleagues1 showed only a 4% risk for 8 year ipsilateral recurrence with lumpectomy alone in women whose excised lesions had margin widths of ≥10 mm. The benefit of tamoxifen might have been lower if the margins of resection were negative, if patients with suspicious residual calcifications had had further surgery, or if an RT boost to the tumour bed had been given to those with positive resection margins.

      Although tamoxifen led to a decrease in non-invasive contralateral DCIS, the absolute reduction was 0.9% (from 1.1% to 0.2%), and no significant effect was seen on the rate of contralateral invasive disease.

      Tamoxifen appears appropriate for some women with DCIS, but perhaps not for all. Further well designed trials should attempt to define the subsets of women who will benefit most from this systemic therapy.


      Author's response

      The points raised by Dr Perez regarding positive margins are similar to those recently published in a letter to the Lancet, to which we gave a detailed response.1



      • Sources of funding: National Institutes of Health; Department of Health and Human Services.

      • For correspondence: Prof B Fisher, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), 4 Allegheny Center, Suite 602, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5234, USA. Fax +1 412 330 4411.

      • * See glossary.

      • Information provided by author.