Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
QUESTION: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), is percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) more effective than thrombolytic treatment?
Data sources
Studies were identified by searching Medline, reviewing scientific session abstracts in the New England Journal of Medicine and 5 cardiology journals, and contacting authors.
Study selection
Studies were selected if they were published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing primary PTCA with intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ST segment MI.
Data extraction
Data were extracted on patient characteristics, symptom duration, use of stents or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, thrombolytic agent used, time to treatment, and results. Outcomes included total mortality, reinfarction, stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, and a combined endpoint of death, reinfarction, and disabling stroke. Short term (4–6 wk) and long term (6–18 mo) effectiveness was assessed.
Main results
23 trials (n=7739) met the inclusion criteria. 8 trials compared PTCA with streptokinase (n=1837) and 15 compared PTCA with fibrin specific …
Footnotes
-
Source of funding: no external funding.
-
For correspondence: Dr E C Keeley, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.Ellen.Keeley{at}UTSouthwestern.edu
-
Abstract and commentary also appear in ACP Journal Club.