Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Q In asymptomatic patients with average risk for colorectal neoplasia, what is the accuracy of virtual colonoscopy for detecting colorectal polyps?
Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆ IM/Ambulatory care ★★★★★★★ Gastroenterology ★★★★★★★
blinded comparison of virtual colonoscopy (VC) with optical colonoscopy (OC).
3 medical centres in the US.
1233 patients (mean age 58 y, 59% men) with average risk of colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria included positive result on guaiac based test of stool ⩽6 months before referral; iron deficiency anaemia in the previous 6 months; rectal bleeding or haematochezia or unintentional weight loss >4.5 kg in the previous 12 months; OC in the previous 10 years; barium enema in the previous 5 years; history of adenomatous polyps, colorectal cancer, or inflammatory bowel disease; and pregnancy.
Description of tests:
VC was done before OC using a computed tomography (CT) protocol wherein pneumocolon was produced by insufflating room air through a rectal catheter immediately before scanning. A 4 or 8 channel CT scanner (GE LightSpeed or LightSpeed Ultra, General Electric Medical Systems) generated 2 and 3 dimensional (3 D) endoluminal displays of the colon and rectum while the patient held his or her breath in the supine …
For correspondence: Dr P J Pickhardt, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI, USA.
Source of funding: Department of Defense.
Abstract and commentary also appear in ACP Journal Club.