Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Q In asymptomatic patients with average risk for colorectal neoplasia, what is the accuracy of virtual colonoscopy for detecting colorectal polyps?
Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆ IM/Ambulatory care ★★★★★★★ Gastroenterology ★★★★★★★
METHODS
Design:
blinded comparison of virtual colonoscopy (VC) with optical colonoscopy (OC).
Setting:
3 medical centres in the US.
Patients:
1233 patients (mean age 58 y, 59% men) with average risk of colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria included positive result on guaiac based test of stool ⩽6 months before referral; iron deficiency anaemia in the previous 6 months; rectal bleeding or haematochezia or unintentional weight loss >4.5 kg in the previous 12 months; OC in the previous 10 years; barium enema in the previous 5 years; history of adenomatous polyps, colorectal cancer, or inflammatory bowel disease; and pregnancy.
Description of tests:
VC was done before OC using a computed tomography (CT) protocol wherein pneumocolon was produced by insufflating room air through a rectal catheter immediately before scanning. A 4 or 8 channel CT scanner (GE LightSpeed or LightSpeed Ultra, General Electric Medical Systems) generated 2 and 3 dimensional (3 D) endoluminal displays of the colon and rectum while the patient held his or her breath in the supine …
Footnotes
-
For correspondence: Dr P J Pickhardt, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI, USA. ppickhardtmail.radiology.wisc.edu
-
Source of funding: Department of Defense.
-
Abstract and commentary also appear in ACP Journal Club.