You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 9, Issue 5
  • Review: vaginal signs and symptoms perform poorly in diagnosing vaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, and vaginal trichomoniasis

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Diagnosis
Review: vaginal signs and symptoms perform poorly in diagnosing vaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, and vaginal trichomoniasis

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.9.5.153

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Anderson MR, Klink K, Cohrssen A. Evaluation of vaginal complaints. JAMA 2004;291:1368–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    
 
 Q In patients with vaginitis, how do individual symptoms, physical examination signs, and laboratory tests perform in diagnosing vaginal candidiasis (VC), bacterial vaginosis (BV), and vaginal trichomoniasis (VT)?

    Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆ Emergency medicine ★★★★★☆☆ Infectious diseases ★★★★☆☆☆

    METHODS

    Embedded ImageData sources:

    studies were identified by searching Medline (1966–April 2003), hand searching the most recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Technical Bulletin, and scanning bibliographies of relevant studies.

    Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

    studies were selected if they included symptomatic patients in primary care or sexually transmitted disease clinics, compared a diagnostic test with a recognised gold standard, calculated sensitivity and specificity, and discussed tests that would provide diagnostic information during the office visit. Gold standard tests …

    View Full Text