Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Randomised controlled trial
Averaging clinic and home measures associated with reductions in within-patient variability and may give a better indication of blood pressure control
  1. Kei Asayama,
  2. Lutgarde Thijs,
  3. Jan A Staessen
  1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Jan A Staessen
    Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Block D, Box 7001, Leuven, BE-3000, Belgium; jan.staessen{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlPubMed


In 2003,1 European guidelines addressed the variability in blood pressure (BP) measurements. They proposed that two or more readings at 1-min intervals be taken at each visit,1 with further readings in case of uncertainty. They also stated that the alarm reaction to BP measurement may persist after several visits, so for patients with sustained elevation of BP, more measurements should be obtained on different occasions over a number of weeks or months before diagnostic or management decisions are made. Alternatively, ambulatory BP measurement or self-measurement of BP away from the medical environment should be performed.1 In a secondary analysis of the Hypertension Intervention Nurse Telemedicine Study (HINTS),2 Powers et al attempted to determine the optimal …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.