Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Observational study
Prescribing of metformin based on estimated GFR rather than serum creatinine expands the eligible population and is likely safe
  1. Ronald L Castelino1,
  2. Gregory Peterson2
  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia;
  2. 2Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Ronald L Castelino, Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia; Ronald.Castelino{at}utas.edu.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Context

Metformin is the only oral antidiabetic drug shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes. A common clinical conundrum facing practitioners while using metformin is the potential risk of lactic acidosis (LA) which has a high mortality rate. Hence, according to the product information, metformin has several contraindications including renal impairment. However, recent studies have questioned some of these contraindications. In particular it has been suggested that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation to prescribe metformin based on serum creatinine (SCr) is overly conservative and may preclude many patients from taking metformin.1 The study by Tout et al investigated the impact of prescribing metformin based on SCr versus the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.